Comments on: Clinical Neuroanatomy

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 06 Apr 2010 11:32:01 +0000

I am a 2nd. Medical students in a student and I have this book for my exam in neuroanatomy. I can not recommend this book for any reason. * The illutration are useless. The resolution is so bad, it’s hard to see where the arrows show. * Too much text and only rarely to the point. Why are things more difficult than they are? Too blah blah in the text.
Rating: 1 / 5

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 06 Apr 2010 09:24:02 +0000

I have acquired books Neuro Major, whose Crossman (for an overview) and Nolte (for further details). Neuro Snell was poorly represented typeography made my eyes strain, the illustrations were not marked properly often lack the most important aspects, the text does not focus on important points, no hierarchy of importance of information. I just can not sell in good conscience money from someone second hand, so I think I’ll give it to the library. Snell Neuro was money out the window. At least AOL disks are free.
Rating: 1 / 5

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 06 Apr 2010 08:35:51 +0000

I am under the MS-II neuro and the 5th Edition and not the 4th, it compares favorably with the popular word Blumenfled. I prefer Snell, because the pictures are a bit easier and more condensed. Clinical correlations at the end of each chapter are good and the themes are important. See what you think of the first library. Devoted to the
Rating: 5 / 5